Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elena Pridankina vs Celine Naef Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pridankina vs Naef analysis and find out who is favored!
Elena Pridankina vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pridankina 1 - 0 Naef
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pridankina has won 49.94% of points on his second serve, while Naef has won 48.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pridankina, in recent form, has won 58.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naef has won 55.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.14% and 39.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pridankina has saved 57.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naef has saved 55.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pridankina has won 72.86% of matches played (W/L 51/ 19), with Naef winning 53.57% (W/L 30/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pridankina has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 26/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 55/ 20). Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 23/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Pridankina has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.77% of matches (W/L 46/ 19), where as Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 23/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pridankina winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pridankina winning 2 and Naef winning 1. The last match between Pridankina and Naef was at the W75 Maribor, 19-03-2024, First, I.hard with Elena Pridankina getting the victory 6-2 1-6 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pridankina and Naef have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pridankina winning 1 times and Naef 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pridankina winning 1, and Naef 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pridankina has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.56 while Naef has played against players with an average rank of 194.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pridankina has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naef has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pridankina has converted 48.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naef has converted 45.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pridankina 1 - 0 Naef
283
Rank
271
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
153
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
74% (103-36)
Career Total W/L
67% (87-42)
75% (18-6)
YTD W/L
57% (17-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$169,770
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pridankina VS Naef H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Elena Pridankina | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:51:0 | 2:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (67/100) | 64% (70/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (42/67) | 64% (45/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (18/33) | 53% (21/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (44/110) | 40% (40/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Pridankina VS Naef H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 1-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elena Pridankina | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (18/6) | 57% (17/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (38/17) | 59% (41/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (285/211) | 56% (349/279) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (12/3) | 58% (11/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 45 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:32 | 1:36:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.71 | 174.07 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1010/1545) | 61% (1228/2025) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (658/1010) | 67% (822/1228) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (267/534) | 48% (384/797) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (105/231) | 45% (122/270) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (798/1689) | 45% (945/2078) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (18/6) | 62% (16/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (17/23) | 57% (17/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 22% (2/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 8% (12/1) |
Elena Pridankina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Elena Pridankina
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
114)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
12
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
114)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Anastasiya Poplavska
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
52%
(
27 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Elena Pridankina
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Daria Zelinskaya
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Elena Pridankina
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
12
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
39 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Estelle Cascino
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Elena Pridankina
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
51%
(
25 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
55
Total Points Won
55
|
6-7(4) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Celine Naef
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Daria Saville
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Celine Naef
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Celine Naef
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Pridankina Vs Naef Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
